From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikolaj Schumacher Subject: Re: [PATCH v2/RFC] git.el: Commands for committing patches Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:44:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <485F0388.4080907@thewritingpot.com> <7vlk0vhmeb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Julliard To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 24 22:45:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KBFOn-0003Fy-Tm for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:45:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752612AbYFXUpA (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:45:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753789AbYFXUpA (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:45:00 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de ([217.72.192.234]:34632 "EHLO fmmailgate03.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752412AbYFXUo7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:44:59 -0400 Received: from smtp08.web.de (fmsmtp08.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.216]) by fmmailgate03.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95447E12AB7B; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:44:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [93.132.185.141] (helo=thursday) by smtp08.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.109 #226) id 1KBFNq-0000Sb-00; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:44:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <7vlk0vhmeb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon\, 23 Jun 2008 14\:27\:56 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2.50 (darwin) X-Sender: n_schumacher@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19Bc1sB1ipN1oroCIkCJei8UvRBepLijop9oLet QJvdM2/1L7QI6zfuOOrFCU9Ex+zcTSVjOLPAZ1Ls7XTAFoqmik 6yXygrPQrDnAHhh+F/MA== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > I do not use things in contrib/emacs/git.el myself, but this looks like a > lot of code to do what "M-| git am " already does... I admit committing email buffers might be unnecessary. I consider it more of a cherry-on-top. The important part is committing patches, because it gives way to partial commits (below file level). regards, Nikolaj Schumacher