From: Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX28: Add delay after CPU bypass is cleared
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 11:49:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2sjfccoc9.fsf@lamuella.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA6A915.8060809@denx.de> (Stefano Babic's message of "Sun, 06 May 2012 18:38:45 +0200")
Hi Stefano,
> On 04/05/2012 13:32, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> This solves issues when larger amount of DRAM is used, like 256MB.
>> Behave the same in case of CPU bypass as we do in case of EMI
>> bypass, but wait 15 ms. We need to wait until the clock domain
>> stabilizes.
>>
>> This issue seemed to have been caused by not waiting after frobbing
>> with the CPU bypass, it was unrelated to memory, but had a direct
>> impact, causing trouble. This was yet another X-File of the
>> imx-bootlets, sigh. The conclusion is, trying a semi-random delay
>> (there is delay after the EMI bypass change), the issue is fixed.
>>
>> Another possible explanation is that we do not do the "simple memory
>> test" FSL does in their imx-bootlets (1000 R/W cycles to/from piece of
>> the memory, while also outputing something on the serial port). This
>> might have caused the similar delay in the imx-bootlets and therefore
>> they didn't need to add this explicitly.
>>
>> For now, this seems good fix enough, but to me, whole that memory
>> init code in imx-bootlets is completely flunked and it'd need deeper
>> investigation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
>> Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
>> Cc: Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>
>> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
>> Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_mem_init.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> V2: Change the description, this issue seemed to have been caused by not
>> waiting after frobbing with the CPU bypass, it was unrelated to memory,
>> but had a direct impact, causing trouble. This was yet another X-File
>> of the imx-bootlets, sigh.
>> V3: Add more conspiracy theories into the commit message.
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_mem_init.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_mem_init.c
>> index 0d13537..9fa5d29 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_mem_init.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_mem_init.c
>> @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ void mx28_mem_setup_cpu_and_hbus(void)
>> /* Disable CPU bypass */
>> writel(CLKCTRL_CLKSEQ_BYPASS_CPU,
>> &clkctrl_regs->hw_clkctrl_clkseq_clr);
>> +
>> + early_delay(15000);
>> }
>>
>
> It is fine with me
>
> Acked-by: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
I'm also content with the commit message now, so I don't want to block
this anymore.
Acked-by: Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>
Cheers
Detlev
--
Sab|bert|jahr - Umgangssprachlich f?r Elternzeit
-- "Wortschatz" v. Sascha Lobo
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-40 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: dzu at denx.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-07 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-03 15:47 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4 V2] Revert "i.MX28: Enable additional DRAM address bits" Marek Vasut
2012-05-03 15:47 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4 RESEND] M28: Scan only first 512 MB of DRAM to avoid memory wraparound Marek Vasut
2012-05-03 15:47 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4 V2] i.MX28: Add delay after CPU bypass is cleared Marek Vasut
2012-05-04 9:20 ` Detlev Zundel
2012-05-04 11:13 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-04 11:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] " Marek Vasut
2012-05-06 16:38 ` Stefano Babic
2012-05-06 16:39 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-07 9:49 ` Detlev Zundel [this message]
2012-05-06 16:28 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4 V2] " Stefano Babic
2012-05-06 16:30 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-03 15:47 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] M28: Enable FDT support Marek Vasut
2012-05-06 15:53 ` Stefano Babic
2012-05-06 16:12 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-06 16:18 ` Stefano Babic
2012-05-06 16:41 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2sjfccoc9.fsf@lamuella.denx.de \
--to=dzu@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.