From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Eial Czerwacki <eial@scalemp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Shai Fultheim \(Shai\@ScaleMP.com\)" <Shai@scalemp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move mostly read variables to __read_mostly section.
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:47:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2sjmj572m.fsf@firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EA45BB8.20505@scalemp.com> (Eial Czerwacki's message of "Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:23:52 +0200")
Eial Czerwacki <eial@scalemp.com> writes:
> * Once the number of bh's in the machine exceeds this level, we start
> --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c 2010-05-12 14:59:32.000000000 -0700
> +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c 2010-05-24 11:56:32.000000000 -0700
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SEQLOC
> * used instead.
> */
> static struct timespec xtime __attribute__ ((aligned (16)));
> -static struct timespec wall_to_monotonic __attribute__ ((aligned (16)));
> +static struct timespec wall_to_monotonic __attribute__ ((aligned
> (16))) __read_mostly;
That means that a common time fetch/update call will usually have to fetch two
cachelines now instead of one, because it needs xtime and
wall_to_monotonic. Usually those end up nearby.
On the other hand it's rare to fetch wall_to_monotonic without xtime.
So if anything all those variables should be grouped together in a
single cacheline, but definitely not split like you do.
The other changes in your patch are fine for me.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-24 4:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-23 18:23 [PATCH] Move mostly read variables to __read_mostly section Eial Czerwacki
2011-10-24 4:47 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2011-10-25 7:25 ` Eial Czerwacki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2sjmj572m.fsf@firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=Shai@scalemp.com \
--cc=eial@scalemp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.