From: Seth Falcon <sethfalcon@gmail.com>
To: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] requiring Perl SVN libraries for git-svn
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:02:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2vekddu5d.fsf@ziti.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061213202142.GE8179@localdomain> (Eric Wong's message of "Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:21:42 -0800")
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> writes:
> Are there any git-svn users out there who would be seriously hurt if I
> dropped support for using the svn command-line client in git-svn?
>
> The API of the SVN:: libraries seem to be relatively stable these days
> and are *much* faster than the command-line client. I plan on
> maintaining compatibility with version 1.1 of the SVN libraries for at
> least another year; or more if it's not a big problem.
I've been using the SVN:: libraries and agree that that they work well
(and faster). One downside I see is that the svn command-line stuff
will Just Work for a lot of folks, whereas obtaining or building svn's
Perl bindings can be more of a chore [*1*].
OTOH, using git-svn via the svn CLI is slow and much less fun than
with SVN::. So I can also see an additional argument to drop so that
people's first impression of git-svn won't be, "gaah, slow" -- because
with the SVN:: libs, my experience has been, "yaah, much faster!" :-)
My $0.02.
+ seth
[*1*] I asked our sysadmin to install the Perl libraries on one of our
new servers and although they seem to be installed, they are
non-functional. git-svn stiffles the error messages, but a simple
script that just tries to require SVN::Core gives:
Can't load
'/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/SVN/_Core/_Core.so'
for module SVN::_Core:
/usr/local/src/subversion-1.4.2/subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/.libs/libsvn_ra_dav-1.so.0:
undefined symbol: PKCS12_SAFEBAG_free at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/DynaLoader.pm line 230.
Anyone else seen this? I guess that if you drop the svn command-line
support, that it would then make sense to error out with more complete
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-15 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-13 20:21 [RFC] requiring Perl SVN libraries for git-svn Eric Wong
2006-12-13 21:17 ` Randal L. Schwartz
2006-12-15 16:02 ` Seth Falcon [this message]
2006-12-15 18:44 ` Eric Wong
2006-12-15 21:06 ` Seth Falcon
2006-12-16 7:58 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/2] git-svn: remove support for the svn command-line client Eric Wong
2006-12-16 7:58 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/2] git-svn: rename 'commit' command to 'set-tree' Eric Wong
2006-12-16 13:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-12-16 21:44 ` Eric Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2vekddu5d.fsf@ziti.local \
--to=sethfalcon@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=normalperson@yhbt.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.