From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thierry Vignaud Subject: Re: Forward: Re: questions for alsa-devel Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 20:26:36 +0200 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <20021002145420.6F590146FB@Cantor.suse.de> <20021002174359.1d2395d3.matthias@rpmforge.net> <20021002192541.6e92b6a2.matthias@rpmforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20021002192541.6e92b6a2.matthias@rpmforge.net> (Matthias Saou's message of "Wed, 2 Oct 2002 19:25:41 +0200") Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Matthias Saou Cc: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Matthias Saou writes: > All this will get so much easier once stable kernels used by Linux > distributions come with ALSA by default ;-) suse & mandrake come with alsa in their kernel, debian has a package, rh doesn't since linus posts on klm seems to indicate we'll have a new stable branch sooner that most believed[1], we may expect most distro to ship kernel-2.6.x in one year (or 6 month for fast integration if linus release 2.6.0, if 2.6.x get stale fast enough, ...) [1] well, we can still do the "i freeze", wait 6 month, "i really freeze", wait a few month of 2.3.9x and test kernels as was di for the 2.4.x branch :-( ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf