From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937005AbXGQVE4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:04:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760832AbXGQVEY (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:04:24 -0400 Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:53703 "EHLO khc.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764070AbXGQVEW (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:04:22 -0400 To: "Kok, Auke" Cc: William Montgomery , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: e100 PCI bridge problem References: <4697B85B.4040902@opinicus.com> <46995998.70706@opinicus.com> <469D0A81.3000001@opinicus.com> <469D1093.9070801@intel.com> From: Krzysztof Halasa Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:04:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <469D1093.9070801@intel.com> (Auke Kok's message of "Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:55:15 -0700") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Kok, Auke" writes: > PERR+ set... not good - this certainly will cause major issues Unfortunately some devices assert PERR without a good reason, and it may do no special harm. Should be handled and cleared, probably. -- Krzysztof Halasa