All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: i386 entry.S problems
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:58:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3acvcf05q.fsf@averell.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2J0sK-6Ot-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (Jan Beulich's message of "Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:00:14 +0200")

"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> writes:
>
> I don't think so. Otherwise, why would arch/i386/Makefile specifically
> deal with this situation?

It shouldn't be enabled for 2.95, there are known miscompilations
caused by it there.  The i386 Makefile enforces this:

cflags-$(CONFIG_REGPARM) 	+= $(shell if [ $(GCC_VERSION) -ge 0300 ] ; then echo "-mregparm=3"; fi ;)

However this points to a bug in that when someone sets this
on 2.95 the assembly functions who check for CONFIG_REGPARM
explicitely will be subtly miscompiled. Perhaps having 
a #error for this case would be better, although that
would break allyesconfig on prehistoric compilers. Maybe 
it needs to be special cased in autoconf.h

-Andi


       reply	other threads:[~2004-09-27 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2J0sK-6Ot-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-09-27 10:58 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2004-09-27 11:19 i386 entry.S problems Jan Beulich
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-27  9:50 Jan Beulich
     [not found] <s157d11c.077@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com>
2004-09-27  9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-27  7:40 Jan Beulich
2004-09-27  7:37 Jan Beulich
     [not found] <2HZ5Q-3MU-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <2HZSa-4nZ-63@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <2IFew-HK-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-09-26 11:38     ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-24 15:25 Jan Beulich
2004-09-24 14:12 Jan Beulich
2004-09-24 14:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-24 15:36   ` Alan Cox
2004-09-26 11:13   ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-24 19:12 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3acvcf05q.fsf@averell.firstfloor.org \
    --to=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.