From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Cloos Subject: Re: [PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:19:05 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1372253045-17042-1-git-send-email-alexdeucher@gmail.com> <51CC3A2E.5000308@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ore.jhcloos.com (ore.jhcloos.com [198.147.23.85]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29FBFE5C6C for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:24:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Alex Deucher's message of "Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:55:40 -0400") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Alex Deucher Cc: Alex Deucher , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org >>>>> "AD" == Alex Deucher writes: AD> Nope. 6xx and APUs do not require ucode. only 7xx+ dGPUs. Does that mean that APUs do not require *any* ucode blobs? Or just that they do not require updated or additional blobs for the new functionality like DPM? -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6