From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48257 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsNiI-0002uB-KU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:01:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PsNiH-0003Sd-Jp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:01:42 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39946) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PsNiH-0003SQ-4g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:01:41 -0500 From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <1298497114-7436-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> (Anthony Liguori's message of "Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:38:34 -0600") References: <1298497114-7436-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:13 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Split machine creation from the main loop Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Anthony Liguori wrote: > The goal is to enable the monitor to run independently of whether the machine > has been created such that the monitor can be used to specify all of the > parameters for machine initialization. > > Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori I agree that it is one step in the right direction, but we are still calling qemu_machine_init() before calling the main_loop(). What is the plan from here? Later, Juan.