From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266491AbUG2BYE (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:24:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267405AbUG2BYD (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:24:03 -0400 Received: from hq.pm.waw.pl ([195.116.170.10]:18408 "EHLO hq.pm.waw.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266491AbUG2BYC (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:24:02 -0400 To: Bernd Eckenfels Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: New dev model (was [PATCH] delete devfs) References: From: Krzysztof Halasa Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:23:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Bernd Eckenfels's message of "Mon, 26 Jul 2004 04:12:44 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bernd Eckenfels writes: > Whats wrong with adding features which touch major parts of the code only to > 2.7, and perhaps bacport them if they proof to be worth it? Someone has to do the actual backporting. -- Krzysztof Halasa