From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sdhci-pxa: add call back interface to share sdhci-pxa Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 09:47:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <487EBCAC-1795-4C69-ACDF-99EC9D7BF604@marvell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:56197 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752415Ab1EMNpl (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2011 09:45:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <487EBCAC-1795-4C69-ACDF-99EC9D7BF604@marvell.com> (Philip Rakity's message of "Thu, 12 May 2011 15:58:19 -0700") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Philip Rakity Cc: zhangfei gao , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , Jun Nie , Raymond Wu , Haojian Zhuang , Wolfram Sang Hi, On Thu, May 12 2011, Philip Rakity wrote: > All other platform specific code is in the host/ directory. > > This moves it to arch/arm > > If that is the direction the group wants to go in --> then the patch > is fine provided the mmc group can review the patches. Otherwise they > are handled by the arm maintainer. Thanks. Wolfram, do you have any ideas on what the best design is for these SoC-specific changes to sdhci-pxa? - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child