From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: rfc - Changing the way gitk and git-gui are managed Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 03:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <7vocdygbw0.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20100727053040.GA6014@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avery Pennarun , Sverre Rabbelier , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 27 12:28:30 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdhOb-0008To-OW for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:28:26 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756023Ab0G0K2U (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:28:20 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:33987 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755772Ab0G0K2T (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:28:19 -0400 Received: by bwz1 with SMTP id 1so3226143bwz.19 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 03:28:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:received :x-authentication-warning:to:cc:subject:references:from:date :in-reply-to:message-id:lines:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=MstL7UP7HWA8liJ6BCNWTe6RSBO7WbvdgPdXbnJz+i4=; b=ozp2Ns3CMRx7rjDwTiZGjEkXGowWSq916YL4gH8JMgQQi/9ZpOMmVgm/ykVJcNzx5P TIC+qEaphcf0TIZvLavko6LwlYgNUZRe2PyVzgqtpdcmYuT8DEu+LUmiVTErBV8W6Us6 JPkxXWXjF0vH6jJyMkcNCsdv+1Gsd3uHotTZ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=x-authentication-warning:to:cc:subject:references:from:date :in-reply-to:message-id:lines:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=OslG+8rBAtRo0rSmAEReQgLxevgLBcD0bvf7xLCfq3K4nC0ivGN3q1WpjoO+buGq0X r6X0mYxKaU+VYOBkGl4R9WlEjT62tlq4Le07iX58iMa7/LQI29JSU7MChq9vfpH4vXnS H75YB+ktv3CV7pkffm04aoQkLgaEI4CFhMFYM= Received: by 10.204.152.4 with SMTP id e4mr6437173bkw.120.1280226497940; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 03:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (abwn25.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.8.237.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y27sm3671621bkw.2.2010.07.27.03.28.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 03:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o6RARd9n027594; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:27:45 +0200 Received: (from jnareb@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id o6RARJES027590; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:27:19 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: jnareb set sender to jnareb@gmail.com using -f In-Reply-To: <20100727053040.GA6014@coredump.intra.peff.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 02:16:45AM -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote: > > > Only this: Junio said that there are no major downsides to this change > > - and given the slow pace of change in gitk/git-gui, this is probably > > true - but are there any *upsides*? What problem does this solve? > > One minor complaint with the current setup is that browsing the history > with path limiting is unintuitive. You can't do "gitk gitk" in the > gitk-git directory. You must instead do "cd .. && gitk -- gitk". Do 'gitk --relative=gitk' or 'gitk --relative' work? -- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git