From: ebiederman@lnxi.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: tharbaugh@lnxi.com
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] refactoring MTD cmdset ops, jedec_probe, and cfi_probe
Date: 13 Jul 2004 09:40:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3n0237w5b.fsf@maxwell.lnxi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1089732108.8696.127.camel@tubarao>
Thayne Harbaugh <tharbaugh@lnxi.com> writes:
> > Thayne this problem I am not familiar with. Could I have some details?
>
> Errrr . . . the problem of the unlock address or of the harry, ugly
> code?
>
> The unlock story is that there was *no* unlock code in cfi_cmdset_0002.
> One of the newer SST chips requires unlocking of the blocks. Unlike
> other chips that need unlocking, the addresses for unlocking this
> particular chip is not at the block address but below the address of the
> entire chip.
Ah. yes. Sorry the way you phrased it I was thinking of the unlock_addr address
prefix that needs to be applied to commands. The magic Firmware hub addresses
that are used for locking/unlocking block I am familiar with.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-13 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-13 3:13 [RFC] refactoring MTD cmdset ops, jedec_probe, and cfi_probe Eric W. Biederman
2004-07-13 6:25 ` David Woodhouse
2004-07-13 7:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-07-13 8:02 ` David Woodhouse
2004-07-13 14:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-07-13 14:45 ` Thayne Harbaugh
2004-07-13 15:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-07-13 15:21 ` Thayne Harbaugh
2004-07-13 15:40 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2004-07-13 16:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-07-14 5:44 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-08-12 7:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-07-13 15:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-07-13 16:17 ` Josh Boyer
2004-08-12 7:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-08-16 14:13 ` Josh Boyer
2004-07-13 16:36 ` Dan Post
2004-07-13 16:52 ` Nicolas Pitre
2004-07-13 17:33 ` Dan Post
2004-07-13 18:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3n0237w5b.fsf@maxwell.lnxi.com \
--to=ebiederman@lnxi.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tharbaugh@lnxi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.