From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: tmio: fix PM in DMA mode Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 18:12:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Guennadi Liakhovetski's message of "Thu, 12 May 2011 12:19:10 +0200 (CEST)") Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , Simon Horman , Ian Molton List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Hi Guennadi, On Thu, May 12 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >> > Please could you send a full patchset against mmc-next for tmio for .40? >> >> Can I also base my patches on next-2.6? I need both - latest mmc and pm, >> so, using next would make it much easier. > > I rebased my stack on top of today's next, no changes were required, so, > here's the order, I have the patches in my tree: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/711251/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/757602/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/757612/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/724081/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/761882/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/761902/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/761922/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/761942/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/777232/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/777262/ > > As long as we manage to get these in 2.6.40 merge window early enough, > we'll be able to push related arch patches via shmobile trees. Thanks, all looks good to me -- pushed to mmc-next, and I'll try to merge early in .40. - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 22:12:35 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: tmio: fix PM in DMA mode Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: (Guennadi Liakhovetski's message of "Thu, 12 May 2011 12:19:10 +0200 (CEST)") MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , Simon Horman , Ian Molton Hi Guennadi, On Thu, May 12 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >> > Please could you send a full patchset against mmc-next for tmio for .40? >> >> Can I also base my patches on next-2.6? I need both - latest mmc and pm, >> so, using next would make it much easier. > > I rebased my stack on top of today's next, no changes were required, so, > here's the order, I have the patches in my tree: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/711251/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/757602/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/757612/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/724081/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/761882/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/761902/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/761922/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/761942/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/777232/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/777262/ > > As long as we manage to get these in 2.6.40 merge window early enough, > we'll be able to push related arch patches via shmobile trees. Thanks, all looks good to me -- pushed to mmc-next, and I'll try to merge early in .40. - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child