From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [RFC] MMC: Block: Ensure hardware partitions don't mess with mmcblk device naming. Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:44:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1303366079-2196-1-git-send-email-andreiw@motorola.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:41724 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752859Ab1DUOkv (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:40:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Andrei Warkentin's message of "Thu, 21 Apr 2011 03:17:25 -0500") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Andrei Warkentin Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrei, On Thu, Apr 21 2011, Andrei Warkentin wrote: > Chris, unfortunately I am working OOF for next couple of days(I am > happy I took my eMMC board with me), so I was not able to test second > card (laptop only has 1 slot). Tested on your mmc tree with SDHCI and > my MMC08G card. Would you mind testing above RFC change? Sorry again > for the regression, grrrr. Sure, happy to test. No need to feel too bad about the regression, we're very early on in preparation for .40. - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child