From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Nx1FH-0002t7-6F
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:58:23 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42643 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nx1FD-0002rm-OK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:58:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1Nx1FC-0006Wq-6l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:58:19 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56457)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1Nx1FB-0006Wg-Ve
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:58:18 -0400
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2VGwGJ9031818
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:58:17 -0400
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <m3oci4o6ca.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> (Markus Armbruster's
	message of "Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:31:49 +0200")
References: <cover.1270022701.git.shaharh@redhat.com>
	<689f24e27d483de0e3201a9386c772dc241d4178.1270022701.git.shaharh@redhat.com>
	<m3634cbxn7.fsf@trasno.mitica> <m3oci4o6ca.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:58:14 +0200
Message-ID: <m3pr2k1l95.fsf@trasno.mitica>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] Added monitor commands: 'keyboard_set'
	and 'info keybaord'
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Shahar Havivi <shaharh@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
> Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> writes:
>> I still think that adding an "id" property as in markus proposal would
>> be neat.  Otherwise I don't know how you are going to distinguish
>> between two keyboards with the same name.
>
> If I understand the patch correctly (only time for a quick skim today),
> the keyboard receives a numeric ID when it is created, and keyboard_set
> identifies it by that ID.  Yes, a user-defined ID would be nicer, and
> consistent with how similar things work.  But the numeric ID isn't
> *wrong*, as far as I can see.

my problem is that if you add two keyboards of the same type, they will
receive random index (different ones), now you do info keyboard, and you
see two keyboard with the same names and different numbers, how do you
know which of the two given you want to choose?

And no, I don't have magic bullet to make multimonitor/keyboard/mouse
behave as expected out of given them right id's.

Later, Juan.