From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N65Vb-00010F-Rs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:48:28 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N65VU-0000sw-Vc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:48:25 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42071 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N65VU-0000sg-L4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:48:20 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:10178) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N65VU-00032B-6O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:48:20 -0500 From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <20091105163741.GA3983@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:37:41 -0500") References: <20091105141335.GY3983@caradoc.them.org> <20091105163741.GA3983@caradoc.them.org> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:47:58 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] Build fixes List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 05:17:46PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: >> How are you compiling? >> It works for me compiling in-tree with make -j3 (only 2 cores) > > I can reliably reproduce it by building all my QEMU configs at once. > I think that's a four-core or eight-core machine, -j4 in each build, > six separate qemu build trees. I've reproduced it in a single build > tree a couple of times, but not reliably. I have no way to reproduce reliablely :( If last patch didn't work for you will try in a more powerful machine. Later, Juan.