All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Tor Arntsen <tor@spacetec.no>
Cc: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>,
	Hilco Wijbenga <hilco.wijbenga@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
	George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>,
	Eugene Sajine <euguess@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [1.8.0] reorganize the mess that the source tree has become
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 02:49:32 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3r5bo848w.fsf@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinQ13b9c1=SmMSC5ThjXcsSuMO2irwW04E+K=xY@mail.gmail.com>

Tor Arntsen <tor@spacetec.no> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 03:06, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:
> > Hilco Wijbenga <hilco.wijbenga@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>> Quite frankly, I'm surprised there are (presumably experienced)
>>> developers who do not immediately see the value of a little
>>> organization. Surely, given the use of code conventions, formatting
>>> rules, etcetera, the obvious one step further is to also organize
>>> where the files go?
>>
>> I think one of the problems is that what's been suggested seems like
>> window-dressing.  Moving everything into src/ and calling it "organized"
>> doesn't actually accomplish much other than perhaps making the README
>> file more visible to newbs; things are _still_ a mess, just a mess with
>> four more letters...
> 
> What Miles says is my feeling as well. And having a 'bin/' as was suggested
> in one post doesn't make much sense to me either - if you want your compiled
> output to go elsewhere than the source directory then the normal way of doing
> that is to do and out-of-tree build (so if that's not working - I have
> not checked - then that's something which would be worth looking into.)

It is about supporting 'srcdir', isn't it?

BTW. what about using 'lib/' directory?
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-04 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-02  2:29 [1.8.0] reorganize the mess that the source tree has become George Spelvin
2011-02-02  8:31 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-02-02 20:01   ` Pascal Obry
2011-02-03  6:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-03  8:09   ` Miles Bader
2011-02-03 18:01   ` Andreas Schwab
2011-02-03 18:46   ` Eugene Sajine
2011-02-03 21:42     ` Hilco Wijbenga
2011-02-04  2:06       ` Miles Bader
2011-02-04  8:30         ` Tor Arntsen
2011-02-04 10:49           ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2011-02-04 11:17         ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-02-04 18:15         ` [1.8.0] " Nicolas Sebrecht
2011-02-04 22:47           ` Drew Northup
2011-02-05 15:11             ` Nicolas Sebrecht
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-31  5:53 What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2011, #06; Sun, 30) Junio C Hamano
2011-01-31 17:05 ` Planning for 1.7.5 and 1.8.0 Junio C Hamano
2011-01-31 20:28   ` [1.8.0] reorganize the mess that the source tree has become Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 20:57     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-01-31 21:08       ` Matthieu Moy
2011-01-31 21:33         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 21:19       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 21:00     ` Jeff King
2011-01-31 21:28       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 22:17         ` Junio C Hamano
2011-01-31 22:36           ` João P. Sampaio
2011-01-31 22:37           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 23:12         ` Jeff King
2011-02-01  0:29           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-01  1:48             ` Jeff King
2011-02-01  4:05               ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-01 12:42                 ` Thomas Rast
2011-02-01 11:14                   ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-02-01 11:22                     ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-02-01 13:08                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-01 16:02                   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-01 21:53               ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-01  0:35           ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-02-01  1:53             ` Jeff King
2011-02-01  1:00           ` Sverre Rabbelier
2011-02-01  1:57             ` Jeff King
2011-02-01  7:24           ` Jay Soffian
2011-02-01 14:42         ` Andreas Ericsson
2011-02-05  3:21     ` Martin von Zweigbergk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3r5bo848w.fsf@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=euguess@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hilco.wijbenga@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux@horizon.com \
    --cc=miles@gnu.org \
    --cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
    --cc=tor@spacetec.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.