All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederman@lnxi.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Flash driver probe/commandset separation.
Date: 03 May 2001 15:45:52 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3r8y6p0mn.fsf@DLT.linuxnetworx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: David Woodhouse's message of "Thu, 03 May 2001 22:40:13 +0100"

David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> writes:

> ebiederman@lnxi.com said:
> >  Note there is a good argument for joining the probe paths Handling
> > chip interleaving, unless we can make it simple we don't want that
> > duplicated many times.
> 
> True. The build_cmd et al macros prevent duplication to a certain extent. 
> 
> > I'll try to have something working for 2 & 4 by the end of today.  Any
> > hints on why the cmdset drivers don't compile? 
> 
> I changed the chip driver registration stuff. They need to have a 
> struct mtd_chip_driver and set mtd->fldrv to point to it. 

I'll look I currently have the simply moved the destroy function into
cfi_probe.  

> And I'd like to 
> make the inter_module_xxx stuff go away completely - maybe they can 
> register with the code in chipreg instead, and get cfi_probe to look them 
> up that way. That can wait a little while though - I'm not sure that's the 
> correct approach (because they're not actually probes).

Right, but something smiliar code work.  Or we could make them serve
dual duty.  

Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-03 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-29 18:38 Flash driver probe/commandset separation David Woodhouse
2001-04-30 15:17 ` AW: " Florian Schirmer / TayTron
2001-04-30 15:56   ` David Woodhouse
2001-04-30 15:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-05-01 14:26   ` David Woodhouse
2001-04-30 17:56 ` Alice Hennessy
2001-05-02 15:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
2001-05-02 15:39   ` David Woodhouse
2001-05-03 17:32     ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-05-03 21:40       ` David Woodhouse
2001-05-03 21:45         ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-02 16:22 Kári Davíðsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3r8y6p0mn.fsf@DLT.linuxnetworx.com \
    --to=ebiederman@lnxi.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.