From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
To: Michael Loftis <mloftis@wgops.com>
Cc: Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FYI: RAID5 unusably unstable through 2.6.14
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:49:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3slrlwkep.fsf@defiant.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B3A20965B8B96960504A5C8@dhcp-2-206.wgops.com> (Michael Loftis's message of "Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:01:29 -0700")
Michael Loftis <mloftis@wgops.com> writes:
> Yup we're on the same page, we just didn't think we were. It happens
> :) R-5 (in theory) could be less reliable than a mirror
Statistically, RAID-5 with 3 or more disks is always less reliable than
a mirror. Strip size doesn't matter.
> or possibly a
> single drive,
With lot of drives.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-18 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-17 19:35 FYI: RAID5 unusably unstable through 2.6.14 Cynbe ru Taren
2006-01-17 19:39 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-01-17 20:13 ` Martin Drab
2006-01-17 23:39 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-18 2:30 ` Martin Drab
2006-02-02 20:33 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-02-03 0:57 ` Martin Drab
2006-02-03 1:13 ` Martin Drab
2006-02-03 15:41 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-03 16:13 ` Martin Drab
2006-02-03 16:38 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-03 17:22 ` Roger Heflin
2006-02-03 19:38 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-03 17:51 ` Martin Drab
2006-02-03 19:10 ` Roger Heflin
2006-02-03 19:12 ` Martin Drab
2006-02-03 19:41 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-03 19:45 ` Martin Drab
2006-01-17 19:56 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-01-17 19:58 ` David R
2006-01-17 20:00 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-01-17 23:27 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-18 0:12 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-01-18 11:24 ` Erik Mouw
2006-01-18 0:21 ` Phillip Susi
2006-01-18 0:29 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-18 2:10 ` Phillip Susi
2006-01-18 3:01 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-18 16:49 ` Krzysztof Halasa [this message]
2006-01-18 16:47 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-02-02 22:10 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-02-08 21:58 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-18 10:54 ` Helge Hafting
2006-01-18 16:15 ` Mark Lord
2006-01-18 17:32 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-19 15:59 ` Mark Lord
2006-01-19 16:25 ` Alan Cox
2006-02-08 14:46 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-18 23:37 ` Neil Brown
2006-01-19 15:53 ` Mark Lord
2006-01-19 0:13 ` Neil Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-03 17:00 Salyzyn, Mark
2006-02-03 17:39 ` Martin Drab
2006-02-03 19:46 ` Phillip Susi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3slrlwkep.fsf@defiant.localdomain \
--to=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mloftis@wgops.com \
--cc=psusi@cfl.rr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.