Re: [BUG] 'add -u' doesn't work from untracked subdir

[Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>]

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> writes:
> 
> > "git add -u ." is friendly enough. Just like "git commit ." versus "git
> > commit -a", which is exactly the same concept and should therefore have the
> > same behavior.
> >
> > You are assuming that people are in a subdirectory because they want to
> > limit the scope. But I am usually in a subdirectory for totally
> > versioning-unrelated reasons.
> 
> Limit the scope of what you see in "ls" (no argument) output, shorten the
> paths you must type to non-git commands.  They are the kind of "limit the
> scope" I meant, and they are totally versioning-unrelated.  In other
> words, cwd-centric default helps the users (especially the new ones) by
> making git behave consistently with other commands.

Well, there is still complication that some commands are considered
whole-tree in absence of pathspec, like "git commit".

> 
> So if anything, I personally think it would be much less surprising if all
> git commands worked relative to the cwd (not whole tree root) when run
> without path argument, at least from the newbie's point of view [*1*].

I think it would be very suprising if "git commit" in subdirectory was
limited to changes affecting given subdirectory...

> 
> But notice that the above is qualified with "personally".  An alternative
> would be to declare that in 1.8.0, all commands run without path argument
> will work on the whole tree and you have to give an explicit '.' when you
> want to limit their effect to the cwd.
> 
> This may be slightly less intuitive to newbies than the "relative to cwd",
> but nevertheless that is the course I would suggest us taking, because of
> the following observations:
> 
>  (1) if the commands work on the whole tree when run without paths, it is
>      easy to limit to the cwd with "git frotz ." when you want to.
> 
>  (2) if the commands work on the cwd when run without paths, you have to
>      always be aware how deep you are, and say "git frotz ../../.." when
>      you want to extend their effects to the whole tree.
> 
> The latter is much more irritating.

Well, we can always invent some magic notation meaning either "up to
top directory", e.g. make

  $ git frotz ...

more or less equivalent to

  $ git frotz "$(git rev-parse --show-cdup)"

(The other solution of having "git frotz /" to refer to top directory
is slightly worse, because there are git commands that work without
git repository, and "/" is legitimate parameter, like e.g. for 
"git diff --no-index").

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git