From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Cloos Subject: Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2260! Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:52:24 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20110610002208.GQ12709@twin.jikos.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110610002208.GQ12709@twin.jikos.cz> (David Sterba's message of "Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:22:08 +0200") List-ID: >>>>> "DS" == David Sterba writes: DS> confirmed, -ENOSPC == -28 So not a novel BUG_ON() after all. On the plus side, it has not re-appeared in the 3.0 rc's. That (4 Gig) fs currently has: :; find /usr/local/portage|wc -l 444073 :; df /usr/local/portage Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sda12 4194304 1278124 1767252 42% /usr/local/portage :; btrfs filesystem df /usr/local/portage/ Data: total=1.21GB, used=822.17MB System: total=4.00MB, used=4.00KB Metadata: total=1.51GB, used=426.00MB Most of the files are quite small, even before compression. About 40% are directories. I've never run balance or defragment on that filesystem. Should I? (It is a single-disk, single-partition fs; it has no subvolumes; it is mounted with rw,noatime,compress=zlib; it is in exports and does get mounted over nfs3.) (I take it balance is for multi-device applications? --help uses the singular 'the device' but the btrfs(8) man page uses the plural 'the devices'....) -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6