All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Bogk <andreas@andreas.org>
To: "linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org"
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>,
	LinuxPPC List <linuxppc-user@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: G3 Upgrade Questions....
Date: 29 Jul 1999 15:30:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3vhb37fdv.fsf@soma.andreas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Geert Uytterhoeven's message of "Thu, 29 Jul 1999 13:50:03 +0200 (CEST)"


Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@cs.kuleuven.ac.be> writes:

> Since the 750 is derived from the 603e, it scores 1 bogomips per MHz. The 604e
> does 2 bogomips per MHz.

This contradicts my readings:

processor       : 0
cpu             : 750
temperature     : 67 C
clock           : 297MHz
revision        : 2.2
bogomips        : 599.65
zero pages      : total 0 (0Kb) current: 0 (0Kb) hits: 0/688 (0%)
machine         : PowerBook
motherboard     : AAPL,PowerBook1998 MacRISC
L2 cache        : 1024K unified pipelined-syncro-burst
memory          : 192MB

But I wouldn't be surprised if the second level cache would influence
the BogoMIPS value by a factor of two.

Andreas

-- 
"We show that all proposed quantum bit commitment schemes are insecure because
the sender, Alice, can almost always cheat successfully by using an
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen type of attack and delaying her measurement until she
opens her commitment." ( http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9603004 )

[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list.  Replies are ]]
[[ not  forced  back  to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting.   ]]

  parent reply	other threads:[~1999-07-29 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <87emhr7ocz.fsf@hades.nocrew.net>
1999-07-29 11:50 ` G3 Upgrade Questions Geert Uytterhoeven
1999-07-29 12:12   ` Stefan Berndtsson
1999-07-29 12:32     ` Chris Ridd
1999-07-29 12:55     ` Gabriel Paubert
1999-07-29 13:30   ` Andreas Bogk [this message]
1999-07-29 16:57 Ron Chmara
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-07-29 14:11 David DeHaven
1999-07-27 22:39 ian geiser
1999-07-28  0:09 ` Paul Mackerras
1999-07-28 22:12   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
1999-07-29  4:46     ` Takayuki Yamaizumi
1999-07-29  9:09       ` Adrian Cox
1999-07-30  1:38         ` Takayuki Yamaizumi
1999-07-30 11:38           ` Charles Lepple
1999-07-28  4:39 ` Neil Jolly
1999-07-28 12:53   ` ian reinhart geiser (ADMIN)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3vhb37fdv.fsf@soma.andreas.org \
    --to=andreas@andreas.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-user@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.