From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Cloos In-Reply-To: <4CDC9192.5090900@fujixerox.co.jp> (Osamu MIHARA's message of "Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:00:02 +0900") References: <20101105105012.F03E.5F9CA008@canon.co.jp> <4CDC9192.5090900@fujixerox.co.jp> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:39:55 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] OpenPrintig Japan November 2010 Meeting Minutes in English List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: printing-japan@lists.linux-foundation.org >>>>> "OM" == Osamu MIHARA writes: OM> OpenPrintig Japan November 2010 Meeting Minutes OM> - Till-san is suggesting poppler based "pdftoraster" is preferable OM> compared with GS based pdftoraster filter. OM> - Otani-san is woking on modify poppler based pdftoraster in order OM> to support CUPS extensions such as cupsBackSide. Has anyone looked at a mupdf-based (aka fitz-based) pdftoraster? It should be faster and use less ram. License is gpl, just like poppler and ghostscript. Git repo is at: http://mupdf.com/repos/mupdf.git -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6