From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
Subject: Re: Congratulations! we have got hash function screwed up
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 15:11:09 +0100
Message-ID: <m3wtuzj2pu.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
References: <77912E9FD42896419D1CEF15E1C397A58AFCF2@london.jaguarfreightservices.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-22950-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <77912E9FD42896419D1CEF15E1C397A58AFCF2@london.jaguarfreightservices.local>
	(Yiannis Mavroukakis's message of "Thu, 30 Dec 2004 13:24:37 -0000")
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Yiannis Mavroukakis <yiannis@jaguarfreight.com>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

"Yiannis Mavroukakis" <yiannis@jaguarfreight.com> writes:

> I agree, but you're generalising, this is not xfs and reiser4 is not 3.5
> ;)
> If you don't try out the shiny new filesystem yourself, how can you
> possibly dismiss it based on the past failures
> of other filesystems? 

I doubt new software is bug-free. I don't expect NFS problems with
reiser4 though, these should be in the regression tests. :-)

-- 
Matthias Andree