From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <glkdd-dm-crypt@m.gmane.org>
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.server123.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
 for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 03:51:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
 (envelope-from <glkdd-dm-crypt@m.gmane.org>) id 1XreJz-0002Nj-EV
 for dm-crypt@saout.de; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 03:51:43 +0100
Received: from c-24-14-20-249.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([24.14.20.249])
 by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
 id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
 for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 03:51:43 +0100
Received: from rnicholsNOSPAM by c-24-14-20-249.hsd1.il.comcast.net with local
 (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
 for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 03:51:43 +0100
From: Robert Nichols <rnicholsNOSPAM@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 20:51:32 -0600
Message-ID: <m4m9bl$fc9$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [dm-crypt] Documentation inconsistency -- On-Disk Format
List-Id: <dm-crypt.saout.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/options/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.saout.de/pipermail/dm-crypt/>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-crypt@saout.de>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=subscribe>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de

I just noticed that in the LUKS On-Disk Format Specification document 1.2.1
http://wiki.cryptsetup.googlecode.com/git/LUKS-standard/on-disk-format.pdf
the LUKS key slots are numbered 1-8, whereas all the tools number them 0-7.
That makes communication difficult.

-- 
Bob Nichols     "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
                 Do NOT delete it.