From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4F1E0044D for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:25:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SNrix-0000IQ-Sx for yocto@yoctoproject.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:25:03 +0200 Received: from tfitzsim-lnx.cisco.com ([161.44.225.6]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:25:03 +0200 Received: from fitzsim by tfitzsim-lnx.cisco.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:25:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: yocto@yoctoproject.org From: Thomas Fitzsimmons Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:18:48 -0400 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: tfitzsim-lnx.cisco.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:qu3l838/BdxqHQ+hN5LWm6diTFg= Subject: Experimenting with kgit-scc X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:25:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Hi, Are there plans in the Yocto roadmap to make the meta/scripts/kgit tools generally usable? I like the organization of the Yocto kernel repository and for my embedded project I'm considering using the Yocto build system along with a Yocto-style kernel tree instead of maintaining my kernel patches as recipe add-ons. The Yocto-style kernel repo could be either a local clone of Yocto's kernel repo with extra machine-specific branches, or a kernel.org tree locally post-processed by kgit-scc. I experimented with meta/scripts/kgit-scc from linux-yocto-dev but the kgit tools don't seem to be intended for general use yet (e.g. the -meta files contain hard-coded home directory paths, and guilt-push complains that guilt-init must be run first). The official Yocto documentation says as much, but I was wondering if there are future plans to generalize these tools. Thanks, Thomas