From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: replace unnecessary div64_u64() with div_u64()
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:27:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mafs05xw0cn8v.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240429121113.803703-1-mwalle@kernel.org> (Michael Walle's message of "Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:11:13 +0200")
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 29 2024, Michael Walle wrote:
> Both occurences of div64_u64() just have a u8 or u32 divisor. Use
> div_u64() instead.
Does this improve performance or is this only for correctness?
Patch LGTM otherwise.
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
BTW, I also noticed that there is a do_div() call in spi_nor_write()
that also uses a u64 dividend and u32 divisor. I was wondering why it
uses do_div() and not div_u64() (I am not sure what the difference
between the two is) but I suppose it doesn't matter much since your
spring cleaning series will delete that code anyway.
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: replace unnecessary div64_u64() with div_u64()
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:27:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mafs05xw0cn8v.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240429121113.803703-1-mwalle@kernel.org> (Michael Walle's message of "Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:11:13 +0200")
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 29 2024, Michael Walle wrote:
> Both occurences of div64_u64() just have a u8 or u32 divisor. Use
> div_u64() instead.
Does this improve performance or is this only for correctness?
Patch LGTM otherwise.
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
BTW, I also noticed that there is a do_div() call in spi_nor_write()
that also uses a u64 dividend and u32 divisor. I was wondering why it
uses do_div() and not div_u64() (I am not sure what the difference
between the two is) but I suppose it doesn't matter much since your
spring cleaning series will delete that code anyway.
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-29 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-29 12:11 [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: replace unnecessary div64_u64() with div_u64() Michael Walle
2024-04-29 12:11 ` Michael Walle
2024-04-29 13:27 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2024-04-29 13:27 ` Pratyush Yadav
2024-04-29 13:47 ` Michael Walle
2024-04-29 13:47 ` Michael Walle
2024-04-29 14:42 ` Pratyush Yadav
2024-04-29 14:42 ` Pratyush Yadav
2024-04-30 15:45 ` Pratyush Yadav
2024-04-30 15:45 ` Pratyush Yadav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mafs05xw0cn8v.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.