From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@google.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
anthony.yznaga@oracle.com, arnd@arndb.de, ashish.kalra@amd.com,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, bp@alien8.de,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, corbet@lwn.net,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
dwmw2@infradead.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, graf@amazon.com,
hpa@zytor.com, jgowans@amazon.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
krzk@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, luto@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com,
pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, robh@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
saravanak@google.com, skinsburskii@linux.microsoft.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, will@kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
thevlad@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 12/17] x86/e820: temporarily enable KHO scratch for memory below 1M
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 15:39:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mafs0ikeyw509.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80622f99-0ef4-491b-87f6-c9790dfecef6@gmail.com> (Usama Arif's message of "Tue, 25 Nov 2025 14:31:54 +0000")
On Tue, Nov 25 2025, Usama Arif wrote:
> On 25/11/2025 13:15, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 24 2025, Usama Arif wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/05/2025 08:46, Changyuan Lyu wrote:
>>>> From: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
>>>>
>>>> KHO kernels are special and use only scratch memory for memblock
>>>> allocations, but memory below 1M is ignored by kernel after early boot
>>>> and cannot be naturally marked as scratch.
>>>>
>>>> To allow allocation of the real-mode trampoline and a few (if any) other
>>>> very early allocations from below 1M forcibly mark the memory below 1M
>>>> as scratch.
>>>>
>>>> After real mode trampoline is allocated, clear that scratch marking.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
[...]
>> Anyway, you do indeed point at a bug. memblock_mark_kho_scratch() should
>> only be called on a KHO boot, not unconditionally. So even with
>> CONFIG_MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH enabled, this should only be called on a KHO
>> boot, not every time.
>>
>> I think the below diff should fix the warning for you by making sure the
>> scratch areas are not present on non-KHO boot. I still don't know why
>> you hit the warning in the first place though. If you'd be willing to
>> dig deeper into that, it would be great.
>>
>> Can you give the below a try and if it fixes the problem for you I can
>> send it on the list.
>
> Is there a reason for compiling this code with is_kho_boot, when we have disabled
> KEXEC_HANDOVER and dont want this in? i.e. why not just ifdef it with MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH
> when that defconfig is designed for it?
is_kho_boot() will always be false when CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER is not
enabled. So the compiler should optimize this out.
Only using the ifdef is not enough. Just because the config is enabled
doesn't mean every boot will be a KHO boot. You can do regular reboots
or even regular kexec, without ever having KHO involved. We only want to
call this for a KHO boot. So a runtime check is needed anyway.
>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
>> index c3acbd26408ba..0a34dc011bf91 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>> #include <linux/firmware-map.h>
>> #include <linux/sort.h>
>> #include <linux/memory_hotplug.h>
>> +#include <linux/kexec_handover.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/e820/api.h>
>> #include <asm/setup.h>
>> @@ -1315,7 +1316,8 @@ void __init e820__memblock_setup(void)
>> * After real mode trampoline is allocated, we clear that scratch
>> * marking.
>> */
>> - memblock_mark_kho_scratch(0, SZ_1M);
>> + if (is_kho_boot())
>> + memblock_mark_kho_scratch(0, SZ_1M);
>>
>> /*
>> * 32-bit systems are limited to 4BG of memory even with HIGHMEM and
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/realmode/init.c b/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
>> index 88be32026768c..4e9b4dff17216 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>> #include <linux/memblock.h>
>> #include <linux/cc_platform.h>
>> #include <linux/pgtable.h>
>> +#include <linux/kexec_handover.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/set_memory.h>
>> #include <asm/realmode.h>
>> @@ -67,7 +68,8 @@ void __init reserve_real_mode(void)
>> */
>> memblock_reserve(0, SZ_1M);
>>
>> - memblock_clear_kho_scratch(0, SZ_1M);
>> + if (is_kho_boot())
>> + memblock_clear_kho_scratch(0, SZ_1M);
>> }
>>
>> static void __init sme_sev_setup_real_mode(struct trampoline_header *th)
>>
>>
>
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-25 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-09 7:46 [PATCH v8 00/17] kexec: introduce Kexec HandOver (KHO) Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 01/17] memblock: add MEMBLOCK_RSRV_KERN flag Changyuan Lyu
2025-10-10 9:33 ` Breno Leitao
2025-10-13 14:59 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-13 16:40 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-14 8:34 ` Breno Leitao
2025-10-14 13:10 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-05 10:18 ` Breno Leitao
2025-11-06 8:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 02/17] memblock: Add support for scratch memory Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 03/17] memblock: introduce memmap_init_kho_scratch() Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 04/17] kexec: add Kexec HandOver (KHO) generation helpers Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 05/17] kexec: add KHO parsing support Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 06/17] kexec: enable KHO support for memory preservation Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 07/17] kexec: add KHO support to kexec file loads Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 08/17] kexec: add config option for KHO Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 09/17] arm64: add KHO support Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 10/17] x86/setup: use memblock_reserve_kern for memory used by kernel Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 11/17] x86/kexec: add support for passing kexec handover (KHO) data Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 12/17] x86/e820: temporarily enable KHO scratch for memory below 1M Changyuan Lyu
2025-11-24 19:24 ` Usama Arif
2025-11-25 0:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-25 12:23 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-25 13:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-25 13:15 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-25 13:50 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-25 18:47 ` Usama Arif
2025-11-26 6:14 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-26 7:25 ` Usama Arif
2025-11-25 14:31 ` Usama Arif
2025-11-25 14:39 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 13/17] x86/boot: make sure KASLR does not step over KHO preserved memory Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 14/17] x86/Kconfig: enable kexec handover for 64 bits Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 15/17] memblock: add KHO support for reserve_mem Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 16/17] Documentation: add documentation for KHO Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 17/17] Documentation: KHO: Add memblock bindings Changyuan Lyu
2025-12-11 3:00 ` Ricardo Neri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mafs0ikeyw509.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anthony.yznaga@oracle.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=changyuanl@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgowans@amazon.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=skinsburskii@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thevlad@meta.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.