All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org,  brauner@kernel.org,  corbet@lwn.net,
	graf@amazon.com,  jgg@ziepe.ca,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	masahiroy@kernel.org,  ojeda@kernel.org,  pratyush@kernel.org,
	rdunlap@infradead.org,  rppt@kernel.org,  tj@kernel.org,
	yanjun.zhu@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/9] kho: don't unpreserve memory during abort
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2025 11:28:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mafs0ldkkbwpa.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251101142325.1326536-7-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> (Pasha Tatashin's message of "Sat, 1 Nov 2025 10:23:22 -0400")

On Sat, Nov 01 2025, Pasha Tatashin wrote:

> KHO allows clients to preserve memory regions at any point before the
> KHO state is finalized. The finalization process itself involves KHO
> performing its own actions, such as serializing the overall
> preserved memory map.
>
> If this finalization process is aborted, the current implementation
> destroys KHO's internal memory tracking structures
> (`kho_out.ser.track.orders`). This behavior effectively unpreserves
> all memory from KHO's perspective, regardless of whether those
> preservations were made by clients before the finalization attempt
> or by KHO itself during finalization.
>
> This premature unpreservation is incorrect. An abort of the
> finalization process should only undo actions taken by KHO as part of
> that specific finalization attempt. Individual memory regions
> preserved by clients prior to finalization should remain preserved,
> as their lifecycle is managed by the clients themselves. These
> clients might still need to call kho_unpreserve_folio() or
> kho_unpreserve_phys() based on their own logic, even after a KHO
> finalization attempt is aborted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>

Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>

[...]

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-05 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-01 14:23 [PATCH v9 0/9] liveupdate: Rework KHO for in-kernel users Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-01 14:23 ` [PATCH v9 1/9] kho: make debugfs interface optional Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07  6:03   ` Zhu Yanjun
2025-11-07 12:00     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 12:02       ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 23:35         ` Yanjun.Zhu
2025-11-08 18:13           ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-10  0:20             ` Zhu Yanjun
2025-11-10 13:16               ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-10 15:26                 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-11  4:11                   ` Zhu Yanjun
2025-11-11 15:26                     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-13  1:41                       ` Yanjun.Zhu
2025-11-13  2:11                         ` Yanjun.Zhu
2025-11-13 19:59                           ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-13 20:07                             ` Yanjun.Zhu
2025-11-13 19:55                       ` Yanjun.Zhu
2025-11-13 20:10                         ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-13 20:13                           ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-13 20:28                             ` Yanjun.Zhu
2025-11-01 14:23 ` [PATCH v9 2/9] kho: drop notifiers Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-06  8:41   ` kernel test robot
2025-11-06 21:46     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-06 22:14       ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-01 14:23 ` [PATCH v9 3/9] kho: add interfaces to unpreserve folios, page ranges, and vmalloc Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-03 18:05   ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-01 14:23 ` [PATCH v9 4/9] memblock: Unpreserve memory in case of error Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-02  6:51   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-05 10:26   ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-01 14:23 ` [PATCH v9 5/9] test_kho: " Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-01 14:23 ` [PATCH v9 6/9] kho: don't unpreserve memory during abort Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-05 10:28   ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2025-11-01 14:23 ` [PATCH v9 7/9] liveupdate: kho: move to kernel/liveupdate Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-06  7:21   ` kernel test robot
2025-11-07 22:23   ` Andrew Morton
2025-11-08 18:01     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-01 14:23 ` [PATCH v9 8/9] MAINTAINERS: update KHO maintainers Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-01 16:36   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-01 14:23 ` [PATCH v9 9/9] liveupdate: kho: Use %pe format specifier for error pointer printing Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-01 19:45   ` Zhu Yanjun
2025-11-02  6:59   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-03 12:59   ` Pratyush Yadav

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mafs0ldkkbwpa.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.