From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84557CF8577 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:25:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=3p8qOthpWydgOBX1TRi7q4Y/4ZncxHSSHMGH189+eH8=; b=nC7HGOzT2uSR57oFbpcVILgs4L mnBn94qR7fp8UC8VgRyJmxyLfMXp1jEc0GPhlRuTWl5W+6JqjiJvjaWWPXuJZFmNFROVOK+PwPcKB 6Xxi+ZcpUVH7I/VTs9D8sSg2Fd30x6QLaFgnDY0r87EfWS7/ta1jSe+NbBzKOA+aXl74BszVvC7un Pi4nFMEyKMUoCSts2z34PgjUR+iJLjC9UBJLT4Atla9LIjjcpVCYvPzTOsKL5CaG4jP1nzV1U3Dbw hgN+ZoRW+wHgvSIUMBkifOdbT8IlY4ozmHyvKMps5kx7UnvSrReu9t9Ihw0UPO5fXPGb0tUYDxp0m Qot9yRIg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vM0v9-00000006Pwt-1kMJ; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:25:43 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vM0v4-00000006PwN-3JFf for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:25:42 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319CF60149; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 109C2C4CEF1; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:25:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763630737; bh=evjGnIEpXhARTPmoO/cs1I6ssBqa6z251Ea4MgH+LQ8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=FNK9vddXtCXrTVzMyiR2HxiHbuMADQ+WlZBq9mC2fCoJRg4vxHKB00hiwoIdlap7D ncqc3fjzIGcBOTVaFUQrnXwJG24cD9mYLD/RvqVcnaucDRl0dDIPHmv1Rs9C0IwqVw s7+c3N4FOk1KTTX99A9jjZwC3qHcvY5iLBrgEQPOsGxXrk1mtM0jfm/6JDLI5Qi6+z /TZt7Ev5zh9kGnqUhkWRjoBdf1vgO6jiUHQe+HwET90FCgxYwHcvztM1shPH/HhBc+ V/XfajD1W9gE/o5+4CzWKlvEzdm98ZirchTgFzeZIbuFPJ86z0jfXVil2Tzx9gkcLq bzCkwzRc9QBYQ== From: Pratyush Yadav To: Greg KH Cc: Pratyush Yadav , Andrew Morton , Alexander Graf , Mike Rapoport , Pasha Tatashin , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add test_kho to KHO's entry In-Reply-To: <2025111944-bullpen-slinging-dcdc@gregkh> (Greg KH's message of "Wed, 19 Nov 2025 17:02:49 +0100") References: <20251118182416.70660-1-pratyush@kernel.org> <2025111944-tracing-unwieldy-1769@gregkh> <2025111944-bullpen-slinging-dcdc@gregkh> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 10:25:34 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Nov 19 2025, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 04:55:06PM +0100, Pratyush Yadav wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 19 2025, Greg KH wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 07:24:15PM +0100, Pratyush Yadav wrote: >> >> Commit b753522bed0b7 ("kho: add test for kexec handover") introduced the >> >> KHO test but missed adding it to KHO's MAINTAINERS entry. Add it so the >> >> KHO maintainers can get patches for its test. >> >> >> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >> > >> > Why is this a patch for stable trees? >> >> If someone finds a problem with this test in a stable kernel, they will >> know who to contact. > > Contacting developers/maintainers should always be done on the latest > kernel release, not on older stable kernels as fixes need to ALWAYS be > done on Linus's tree first. > > Please don't force us to attempt to keep MAINTAINERS changes in sync in > stable kernel trees, that way lies madness and even more patches that > you would be forcing me to handle :) Okay, my bad. Feel free to ignore this patch then. And I will keep that in mind the next time around. Andrew, can you please drop the "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org" when you apply? -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav