All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Evangelos Petrongonas <epetron@amazon.de>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	 Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
	 Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	 <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	 <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <nh-open-source@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] efi: Support booting with kexec handover (KHO)
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 14:17:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mafs0segvlt0g.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b34da9fd50c89644cd4204136cfa6f5533445c56.1755721529.git.epetron@amazon.de>

On Thu, Aug 21 2025, Evangelos Petrongonas wrote:

> When KHO (Kexec HandOver) is enabled, it sets up scratch memory regions
> early during device tree scanning. After kexec, the new kernel
> exclusively uses this region for memory allocations during boot up to
> the initialization of the page allocator
>
> However, when booting with EFI, EFI's reserve_regions() uses
> memblock_remove(0, PHYS_ADDR_MAX) to clear all memory regions before
> rebuilding them from EFI data. This destroys KHO scratch regions and
> their flags, thus causing a kernel panic, as there are no scratch
> memory regions.
>
> Instead of wholesale removal, iterate through memory regions and only
> remove non-KHO ones. This preserves KHO scratch regions, which are
> good known memory, while still allowing EFI to rebuild its memory map.
>
> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Evangelos Petrongonas <epetron@amazon.de>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> 	- Improve the code comments, by stating that the scratch regions are
> 	good known memory
>
> Changes in v2:
> 	- Replace the for loop with for_each_mem_region
> 	- Fix comment indentation
> 	- Amend commit message to specify that scratch regions
> 	are known good regions
>
>  drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
> index a00e07b853f2..a65c2d5b9e7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #include <linux/efi.h>
>  #include <linux/fwnode.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/kexec_handover.h>
>  #include <linux/memblock.h>
>  #include <linux/mm_types.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
> @@ -164,12 +165,32 @@ static __init void reserve_regions(void)
>  		pr_info("Processing EFI memory map:\n");
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Discard memblocks discovered so far: if there are any at this
> -	 * point, they originate from memory nodes in the DT, and UEFI
> -	 * uses its own memory map instead.
> +	 * Discard memblocks discovered so far except for KHO scratch
> +	 * regions. Most memblocks at this point originate from memory nodes
> +	 * in the DT and UEFI uses its own memory map instead. However, if
> +	 * KHO is enabled, scratch regions, which are good known memory
> +	 * must be preserved.
>  	 */
>  	memblock_dump_all();
> -	memblock_remove(0, PHYS_ADDR_MAX);
> +
> +	if (is_kho_boot()) {
> +		struct memblock_region *r;
> +
> +		/* Remove all non-KHO regions */
> +		for_each_mem_region(r) {
> +			if (!memblock_is_kho_scratch(r)) {
> +				memblock_remove(r->base, r->size);
> +				r--;

Hmm, this caught me off-guard. I had to do a double take to realize that
memblock_remove() would decrease memblock.memory.cnt and move the whole
regions array back. A comment would have been nice here.

But then, I wouldn't want you to do a full resend of the series for this
minor nitpick. So perhaps whoever is taking this patch can add one when
applying? Either way is fine though...

Acked-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>

> +			}
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * KHO is disabled. Discard memblocks discovered so far:
> +		 * if there are any at this point, they originate from memory
> +		 * nodes in the DT, and UEFI uses its own memory map instead.
> +		 */
> +		memblock_remove(0, PHYS_ADDR_MAX);
> +	}
>  
>  	for_each_efi_memory_desc(md) {
>  		paddr = md->phys_addr;

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-09 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-21 17:58 [PATCH v3 0/2] efi: Fix EFI boot with kexec handover (KHO) Evangelos Petrongonas
2025-08-21 17:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] kexec: introduce is_kho_boot() Evangelos Petrongonas
2025-09-09 12:13   ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-08-21 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] efi: Support booting with kexec handover (KHO) Evangelos Petrongonas
2025-08-23 21:47   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-04  7:19     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-04  9:34       ` Evangelos Petrongonas
2025-09-04  9:39         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-04 12:57           ` Evangelos Petrongonas
2025-09-08  5:50             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-09 12:17   ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2025-08-21 20:58 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] efi: Fix EFI boot " Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mafs0segvlt0g.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=changyuanl@google.com \
    --cc=epetron@amazon.de \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nh-open-source@amazon.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.