From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69043CA0FED for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2025 17:14:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Tt9cZvyCH1e69uk1ra9K12GwG7NHIEkl8OmCsIymvgw=; b=lXkdWP3BrUm7nS+LPH1DKOyPuT U40y8tEA0ZNk2SaQepzeDBXe/zEpJwF4vLPKTkXQ+iJwe7JaRYKc/LVZjLlu3JQq7wGkPoeRe0Uin FxWOxZjJCXeAMp3rLQNzuCmOinTA8lBxKrcYzUN1opfCkZf3dqkSSp5RdQgLqbIJCtsZMtOxQmfqN yTLz9/VM544lv+GGEnLj96hUUF7fEv9ov3eVoSIdnT6sAJQBZblpQlpoi0HkenQxGkMnHeCb9KqaM lQ1JHD0I8eYkSm//Cg2o119YuWAF11avmE2OQStkA9uEWYLnLNqP31aO2oQnwQ/LKuCtqmTV8wPim vYc2ilIw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uw1vX-00000008nD1-1Asj; Tue, 09 Sep 2025 17:14:43 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uvxEY-00000006zpM-1CB3 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2025 12:14:02 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A6C6021E; Tue, 9 Sep 2025 12:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F938C4CEF4; Tue, 9 Sep 2025 12:13:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757420041; bh=tMruF9j+G2L1N4zuR4KW/thijoi3DgRD3fEIsvtunMI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=CuzrSo2wC8/+3xPSVkuL28/fLvs9z4VJpLDFlrUXZ9QxiUGZDvez1QEhrB8XqYimj fKwvYQVXCm9wRitIRSPiL/qlnuM7XUwUnU4c/0qtwyqJOfv2HKela5PjaLj6vZQ9NO iAFuNP2nZ+O8FTxe3FH2XmZGMJED34JrwSPdAMQDeQ6/Lil+VBaI8Bd9U44Pkysx+A Ib6wrhmrBV1nEtPBDWRL8WlJP18Z4x0QyfHsHTEvgiQgITLatG+f31/iTaMSKMOluJ KF+40oysRCqEyp2iNF1E4WvSlF21xGRkW/L7Rm0ZCdf1+vBw7KShria3xnXpbaPKz+ ki1J91Mqyr//w== From: Pratyush Yadav To: Evangelos Petrongonas Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Mike Rapoport , Alexander Graf , Changyuan Lyu , Andrew Morton , Baoquan He , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] kexec: introduce is_kho_boot() In-Reply-To: <7dc6674a76bf6e68cca0222ccff32427699cc02e.1755721529.git.epetron@amazon.de> References: <7dc6674a76bf6e68cca0222ccff32427699cc02e.1755721529.git.epetron@amazon.de> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 14:13:58 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Aug 21 2025, Evangelos Petrongonas wrote: > During early initialisation, after a kexec, other components, like EFI > need to know if a KHO enabled kexec is performed. The `kho_is_enabled` > function is not enough as in the early stages, it only reflects > whether the cmdline has KHO enabled, not if an actual KHO FDT exists. > > Extend the KHO API with `is_kho_boot()` to provide a way for components > to check if a KHO enabled kexec is performed. Neat! I have always found doing if (kho_get_fdt()) a bit awkward. Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav [...] -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav