From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EE2610E9 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 11:17:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750677450; cv=none; b=RHYPmsUvQFnkDMYX+ZEkAvm+miy6PMA8IbvToIirWpMZGWjBp8GnhKUbew89OE3nUbWef3OCwL8vt0OhTKF9Swt2ztPfxwu4kAZgy5j1Cm72xQEz67Y61d6jAOYdBIWON4slfw4TmUzYN/SjXxzBLRWu/ihM6sayMxj9krUI/OU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750677450; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ovl/bHYb6C3KR3AeewAgyU8Q13C+1+oe9okwz4HcAeg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uiPgigxsGPL5LbqOPd6Nw5ayx7ynXkY6eL3HuNbNEQLlZfm6G0XS8L6IpzDal3et7ulBhY8r1YNsChaJYhxQUuzCDfr1yf5p1djB08TEpdQQvYOSQdzbVo9OGWzAEPOeysMoR6kucLigFRPDArz30NC8tEOVk2MCyBbp/mK2LJo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OEr69dhK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OEr69dhK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A78F6C4CEF0; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 11:17:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1750677449; bh=ovl/bHYb6C3KR3AeewAgyU8Q13C+1+oe9okwz4HcAeg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=OEr69dhKSRthCqaEgPW64NAaUuEPniLMmF9+/ZeaS31fTcklJn52PJOAiqardC16M 7SE8iurS7Xnkqck1Rnwd10AzqjmoC1N4PL1K9EBFczG21fUXomRqhFYVmShBjsCr3k NGKDeCyxnDmA4f/U2OxhUBkRBWpMPFOSQ/AnIyBJ4lPbhfdOB3Ssce41bZ+Ubj1//p aLDIQ4y0NzbDsJemMMNMH4yBnFP5P6ftUV76MEpgPPNNMXPgpNvjAHRY0/V4p12MHV 6vxwQTZ13XXjhdrczmCft1yfwbFk+UUp98mO3ZwRiS+e9fQoXFbcFrckuC78C/VrOD oGx6zyzj/YA/A== From: Pratyush Yadav To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Linus Torvalds , Pratyush Yadav , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alexander Usyskin , Miquel Raynal Subject: Re: Linux 6.16-rc1 In-Reply-To: <2e7b74ad-b308-46af-9edb-59c0ce416d89@roeck-us.net> References: <241b0829-5fec-4d88-866a-ba59e2ca748e@roeck-us.net> <2e7b74ad-b308-46af-9edb-59c0ce416d89@roeck-us.net> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 13:17:27 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Sun, Jun 22 2025, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 08:59:46AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 at 05:44, Pratyush Yadav wrote: >> > >> > I don't have much idea of how people use qemu for testing, but since you >> > say this is important for testing workloads, I can take a deeper dive >> > next week and have an answer by -rc4. >> >> Thanks. I'm not sure *how* important this is, but if it affects >> Guenter's test coverage, I assume it affects others too. >> >> But it's not entirely clear how much it *does* affect Guenter. He says >> five failed tests, but those are all accounted for by the master >> device thing. >> >> Guenter, maybe you can clarify? >> > > Sorry for the delay; I was travelling. > > I modified qemu to make the flash type configurable, so it is not a problem > for me. However, anyone using upstream qemu will see the problem. My qemu patch > adding the option to configure the flash type was rejected, so those affected > will have to wait for a proper qemu fix. > > I would suggest to not make any changes in the kernel: The qemu problems should be > fixed in qemu. I only brought this up to raise awareness that there is a qemu related > problem, not to ask for a change in the Linux kernel. In case you missed it, see my reply in [0]. For me the flash works fine with qemu v10.0.0. Which version do you have? Anyway, I agree with you. Without further evidence, I think the kernel side is fine and no fixes should be needed. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/mafs01prbvbjm.fsf@kernel.org/ -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav