From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
To: zaitcev@redhat.com
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: NFS "dev_t" issues..
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 14:15:58 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.1009923541.1261.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com> (raw)
I made a pre6, which contains a new-and-anal "kdev_t".
The format of the thing is the same as it used to be, ie 16 bits of
information, but I made it a structure so that you _couldn't_ mix up
"dev_t" and "kdev_t", or use the "kdev_t" as a number (so when kdev_t
expands to 12+20 bits later in 2.5.x you shouldn't get surprises)
I fixed up the stuff I use and which showed up in compiles (on a source
level, it's so far totally untested), but I'd really like people to check
out their own subsystems. _Especially_ NFS and NFSD, which had several
cases of mixing the two dev_t's around, and which also used them as
numbers. Trond, Neil?
Because the types aren't at all compatible any more, the macros that are
used for user-level "dev_t" are no longer working for a kdev_t. So we have
dev_t kdev_t
MKDEV(major,minor) mk_kdev(major, minor)
MAJOR(dev) major(dev)
MINOR(dev) minor(dev)
dev == dev2 kdev_same(dev, dev2)
!dev kdev_none(dev)
and _most_ of the time the fixes are trivial - just translate as above. It
only gets interesting when you have code that looks at the value or starts
mixing the two and compares a "dev_t" against a "kdev_t", which can be
quite interesting.
The knfsd file handle thing is also an issue - Neil, please check out that
what I did looks sane, and would be on-the-wire-compatible with the old
behaviour, even when we expand kdev_t to 12+20 bits, ok?
(Marcelo, for easier backporting of drivers to 2.4.x, we'll probably want
to eventually add
#define mk_kdev(a,b) MKDEV(a,b)
#define major(d) MAJOR(d)
...
to the 2.4.x <linux/kdev_t.h> so that you can move drivers back and
forth).
Apart from some knfsd issues, most of the kdev_t users were proper. The
strict type-checking found one bug in the SCSI layer (which I knew about,
and was one of the impetuses for doing it in the first place), and found a
lot of small "works-but-will-break-with-a-bigger-kdev_t" issues).
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next reply other threads:[~2002-01-01 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-01 22:15 Linus Torvalds [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-02 4:52 NFS "dev_t" issues Andries.Brouwer
2002-01-01 22:15 Linus Torvalds
2002-01-01 22:57 ` Alexander Viro
2002-01-01 23:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-02 5:45 ` Greg KH
2002-01-07 16:50 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mailman.1009923541.1261.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com \
--to=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.