From: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Screwy network question
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:48:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-100108732508435@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-100104268024036@msgid-missing>
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:26:40PM -0500, Gerry Creager N5JXS wrote:
> This doesn't come under the call of traffic control, but this group's
> about the best place I can think of to ask the question.
>
> Under IPRoute2, or Zebra, or GATED, or anything else that'll work, and
> looking at the attached PNG, does anyone have some suggestions for
> making this thing work? R1 and R2 will have to use BGP4 to peer with
> the Internet 2 router. R1 can fully advertise routes. R2 must get
> updates but NOT advertise routes. R2 or an additional box must NAT to a
> real address anything going to Internet 2. R1 has no NAT requirements.
Your PNG is nearly unreadable, so if you can provide a better one, please
do. Also, do you have tangible problems already, or is this an openended
question?
I am very interested to help, but so far your question is pretty broad.
> The NAT/proxy boxes are not negotiable, as they are associated with
> school districts, and thanks to Congress, we have requirements for
> content filtering that are of questionable value, but are law.
'The land of the free'.
> Any thoughts or suggestions anyone might have would be appreciated!
Well, gated is old, and I don't thinkt it does BGP4. Zebra is pretty cool
and there is also another project like it that you might want to look into.
If I remember the name, I'll post it.
But please supply more information!
Regards,
bert
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services
Trilab The Technology People
Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl - Nerd Available -
'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-21 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-21 3:26 [LARTC] Screwy network question Gerry Creager N5JXS
2001-09-21 15:48 ` bert hubert [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-100108732508435@msgid-missing \
--to=ahu@ds9a.nl \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.