From: Alberto Bertogli <albertogli@altavista.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (almost!)
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 02:45:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-100742087601258@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-100734471005654@msgid-missing>
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 03:32:15AM +0100, bert hubert wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 11:16:49PM -0300, Alberto Bertogli wrote:
>
> > The comment, still present today (of course =) is:
> >
> > Note that the peak rate TBF is much more tough: with MTU 1500
> > P_crit = 150Kbytes/sec. So, if you need greater peak
> > rates, use alpha with HZ\x1000 :-)
> >
> > Even below in the description, when it describes peakrate parameter, it
> > says "However, due to de default 10ms timer resolution of Unix, with
> > 10.000 bits average packets, we are limited to 1mbit/s of peakrate!"
>
> 150Kbytes/sec -> 1mbit/s! (more or less). Depends a bit on what your average
> packet size is.
>
Yeah I'm just stupid and read everything as bps. Luckly i forgot to CC to
the list =)
> SFQ doesn't shape, so it's a whole different ballgame.
Yeah, I shape with CBQ anyway.. what reminds me to my next question: is
HTB going to be merged in 2.4? is it ready for production use?
Thanks,
Alberto
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-03 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-03 1:58 [LARTC] CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (almost!) bert hubert
2001-12-03 2:26 ` Jim Fleming
2001-12-03 2:45 ` Alberto Bertogli [this message]
2001-12-03 2:53 ` bert hubert
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-01 0:33 Finally, CBQ nearly completely documented bert hubert
2001-12-03 2:00 ` CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (almost!) bert hubert
2001-12-03 2:26 ` [LARTC] " Jim Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-100742087601258@msgid-missing \
--to=albertogli@altavista.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.