From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: don-lartc@isis.cs3-inc.com (Don Cohen) Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 15:41:20 +0000 Subject: [LARTC] naming classes/qdiscs - answer Message-Id: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org > is the naming of classes essential for building them correctly? is parent 1:1 classid 10:0 somehow different from parent 1:1 classid 1:2? up to now i thought classid was only a name and the parent would be enough to make the classes' positions in the tree unambiguously... I think I mentioned this in my review of the recent howto updates. Here's the explanation from http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/ Note: In general (not just for HTB but for all qdiscs and classes in tc), handles are written x:y where x is an integer identifying a qdisc and y is an integer identifying a class belonging to that qdisc. The handle for a qdisc must have zero for its y value and the handle for a class must have a non-zero value for its y value. The "1:" above is treated as "1:0". _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/