From: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB not that exact
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2001 11:52:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-100781240318403@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-100766696815760@msgid-missing>
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 06:57:39PM +0200, Sami Farin wrote:
> Ahu wrote:
> > Both I think. There are some indications that raising HZ may not work, as it
> > may not raise the resolution of the timers in the Linux Kernel - I am
> > investigating this! So try keeping HZ stable, and raising the size of your
> > bucket.
>
> would it make any difference if you do...
Ok - I've since investigated this. Shapers use timers internally to block
themselves for set periods of time. These timers appear to have HZ
resolution, but a comment in the very good Linux Device Drivers book
http://www.xml.com/ldd/chapter/book/
appeared to indicate that raising HZ would not raise their resolution.
I contacted Jonathan Corbet, one of the authors, and he checked and found
that the book was incorrect: raising HZ *does* increase timer resolution.
> -#define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_JIFFIES
> +#define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_CPU
>
> I didn't see PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE in the 2.4routing docs...
> Can you tell more about PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE ?
As far as I can see, this only increases the *resolution*, not *precision*.
In other words, you can't specify shorter delays this way but you can
measure a delay that already happened far more precisely.
For example, if you decide to delay for 1 jiffy, 10ms, you may in fact have
waited 14ms. PSCHED_JIFFIES will not see this - 1.4=1 jiffy has passed.
PSCHED_CPU *will* see it, and let the right amount of packets out.
But I'm hoping that Martin Devera can check this for me, devik?
Regards,
bert
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services
Trilab The Technology People
Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl - Nerd Available -
'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-08 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-06 19:28 [LARTC] HTB not that exact Stefan Rompf
2001-12-06 19:48 ` bert hubert
2001-12-06 20:33 ` Daniel Ryczek
2001-12-06 21:35 ` Stefan Rompf
2001-12-07 11:46 ` david
2001-12-07 16:57 ` Sami Farin
2001-12-08 8:51 ` Martin Devera
2001-12-08 11:52 ` bert hubert [this message]
2001-12-08 11:53 ` bert hubert
2001-12-08 15:18 ` devik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-100781240318403@msgid-missing \
--to=ahu@ds9a.nl \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.