From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael T. Babcock" Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:52:05 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: further CBQ/tc documentation ds9a.nl/lartc/manpages Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:38:33AM +0100, Martin Devera wrote: > IMHO ingres queuing could be used as poor man's way how to reshape > (or priorize) traffic which can't be shaped at egress side (usualy > because of adminstrative boundaries). This need would vanish in > presence of such classfull work conserving CBQ. Please fill me in -- how could it ever not be possible to shape egress traffic? Or are you refering to the egress traffic of the upstream to the machine whose ingress side you wish to modify? -- Michael T. Babcock CTO, FibreSpeed Ltd. (Hosting, Security, Consultation, Database, etc) http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/