From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael T. Babcock" Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:54:29 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: further CBQ/tc documentation ds9a.nl/lartc/manpages Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:41:59AM +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > example, consider the not too uncommon example of a computer connected via > 100Mbps networking to a DSL modem, and you want to tune the use of the link > without needing to introduce a router inbetween. Assuming there is only one computer (and therefore no need for the router), why would you want something other than a work-conserving ingress policy? Drop certain packets, allow everything else ... I can almost see your point if we're discussing very slow computers, but in that case the qdisc's would slow it down more -- could you please fill me in on your assumptions here? -- Michael T. Babcock CTO, FibreSpeed Ltd. (Hosting, Security, Consultation, Database, etc) http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/