From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Martin Devera <devik@cdi.cz>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 14:02:39 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: further CBQ/tc documentation ds9a.nl/lartc/manpages
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-100799302703345@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-lartc-100785524509147@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-100785524509147@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

> > IMHO ingres queuing could be used as poor man's way how to reshape
> > (or priorize) traffic which can't be shaped at egress side (usualy
> > because of adminstrative boundaries). This need would vanish in
> > presence of such classfull work conserving CBQ.
> 
> Please fill me in -- how could it ever not be possible to shape
> egress traffic?  Or are you refering to the egress traffic of the
> upstream to the machine whose ingress side you wish to modify?

exactly.


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/