From: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SV: [LARTC] I know there must be a way ...
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 23:26:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-100811324514553@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-100811264713159@msgid-missing>
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:19:09AM +0100, Paul Wisen wrote:
> Got to ask.. (this is kind of cool btw) ..
>
> What machine will he need to shape traffic at those speeds ?
Hehe, yeah, that is a problem. 300mbit in + 300mbit out requires a quality
machine, probably with multiple PCI busses, or 64bit if possible.
> Our ISP is probably interested.. We need to shape traffic at 155Mbit/s
> speeds to do it though.. And, I mentioned that they probably should consider
> to use a linuxbox to prioritize cusomer like us in favour of those private
> customers on their fibre network... Or atleast do fair quing..
Well, some things can be done at that rate and other things can't. 155Mbit/s
is well within Linux' range, we've routed 90mbit/s (90 in, 90 out) on a low
end machine.
RED certainly works at those rates as it is very simpleminded. SFQ is
probably out, unless you recompile your kernel. At those speeds you may want
larger queues than 128 packets, which is the SFQ default.
PRIO would also not be a problem. I think a PRIO with RED qdiscs may be what
you want.
And who knows, CBQ is also *very* lightweight in its determination of link
utilization.
I would say that this is most likely possible at 155Mbit/s. You will need to
ask around - lots of people are doing gigabit experiments, some
configurations work far better than others.
Regards,
bert
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services
Trilab The Technology People
Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl - Nerd Available -
'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-11 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-11 23:19 SV: [LARTC] I know there must be a way Paul Wisen
2001-12-11 23:26 ` bert hubert [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-100811324514553@msgid-missing \
--to=ahu@ds9a.nl \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.