From: Amit Kucheria <amitk@ittc.ku.edu>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] CBQ inaccuracy
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 07:50:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-100822988013280@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-100820629913063@msgid-missing>
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, bert hubert wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 07:17:43PM -0600, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > I have found CBQ to be very inaccurate (as others on the list)
> >
> > I have created a structure as follow
> >
> > Root (10mbit)
> > |
> > CBQ class (bandwidth=1mbit, rate\x10mbit)
> > |
> > CBQ qdisc (bandwidth=1mbit)
>
> Um, this doesn't make sense. I keep repeating this to posters here, SHOW
> YOUR CONFIGURATION! Don't just draw pictures - your CBQ commandlines may not
> do what you think they do.
My apologies. Here's the script
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BANDWIDTHºndwidth 10Mbit
LIMITBW=1Mbit
# Root CBQ qdisc 1:
$TC qdisc add $DEVICE root handle 1: cbq $BANDWIDTH $AVPKT
# Root CBQ class 1:1
# This class rate limits everyting to 1Mbit
$TC class add $DEVICE parent 1:0 classid 1:1 cbq $BANDWIDTH rate $LIMITBW
\
maxburst 100 $AVPKT allot 1514 weight 100Kbit prio 1 bounded isolated
# Filter packet from the 2 sources
$TC filter add $DEVICE parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip src
$SRC1 flowid 1:1
$TC filter add $DEVICE parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip src
$SRC2 flowid 1:1
# CBQ qdisc 2:0
$TC qdisc add $DEVICE parent 1:1 handle 2:0 cbq bandwidth $LIMITBW $AVPKT
allot 1514
-------------------------------------------------------
--
The statement below is true.
The statement above is false.
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Amit Kucheria
EECS Grad. Research Assistant
University of Kansas @ Lawrence
(R)+1-(785)-830 8521 ||| (O)+1-(785)-864 7774
____________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-13 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-13 1:17 [LARTC] CBQ inaccuracy Amit Kucheria
2001-12-13 7:14 ` bert hubert
2001-12-13 7:50 ` Amit Kucheria [this message]
2001-12-13 8:20 ` Stef Coene
2001-12-13 8:49 ` bert hubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-100822988013280@msgid-missing \
--to=amitk@ittc.ku.edu \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.