From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael T. Babcock" Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 15:09:04 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Traffic balancing by IP. Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 04:36:41PM +0200, Dmitri Gofmekler wrote: > The problem is that the amout of addresses is unknown. Now it is 3xC class, > in the future will be more... If all you want is "fairness"; each gets a 'fair' share of the bandwidth, SFQ will handle the rest. If you just add SFQ as the root qdisc or under a root CBQ/HTB/etc. class, you should be fine. If you have a lot of addresses and active machines, you may with to increase the number of SFQ hash buckets. -- Michael T. Babcock CTO, FibreSpeed Ltd. (Hosting, Security, Consultation, Database, etc) http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/