RE: Re: [LARTC] Re: Two-way Shared Traffic shaping and NAT

["Sumit Pandya" <sumit@elitecore.com>]

Hey Bert,

	I'd like to go through detail of nice effort made by you peoples. As you
answered, to use IMQ for my requirement, I placed this question. How did you
answered is quite sarcastic to me. I feel that you forgot yourself as a good
contributor of open-source. Otherwise there would be a warm support to test
your development at one more place and feedback you.

	Oh yeah I confess that I'm a novice in open-source development but not
newbie and very much experienced with Linux kernel network code. Which
includes netfilter hack, some driver modification and detail understanding
of Linux routing code... Anyway I'm not intended to describe my skills.
	I won’t replace my request to you, infact this time loud against whatever I
shown you for my contribution; ya simple but not trivial "a detail
feedback".

	Thankx if you take some time off to write for me to go ahead task.
-- Sumit

-----Original Message-----
From: bert hubert [mailto:ahu@ds9a.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2001 5:51 PM
To: Sumit Pandya
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl; devik@cdi.cz
Subject: Re: Re: [LARTC] Re: Two-way Shared Traffic shaping and NAT


On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 01:48:35PM +0530, Sumit Pandya wrote:
> Hi Devik and All,
>
> >> You can find more information on http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/.
There
> is only one relase, but it's so simple, that are no bugs (according to
> Devik).
>     	I want an architecturial/functional details of your "IMQ"
development.

So you want that.

> The document on the link is insufficient to explain anything. If you can

You may be insufficiently smart to grasp it.

I seriously think you did not grap how open source works. This is *not* the
way to participate!

Regards,
bert


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/