Re: [LARTC] Wonder Shaper problem?

["Jason A. Pattie" <pattieja@pcxperience.com>]

So then is there a way to modify the packet on the way out of squid to 
force it to be the TOS we want that will cause it to go to 20: instead 
of 10: ?  Maybe modification of squid is in order? to keep it from 
changing the TOS field?  (We have the source!  :) )

Or is there some other way to make it so that SSH traffic itself is 
bumped to higher priority than just the generic 0x10 TOS packets?  Maybe 
match on destination or source port 22?

Dhaval Patel wrote:

>i could be wrong its been some time since i did this but i think that 0x10 is
>for quick response time 0x08 is for high throughput  0x04 is for a more
>guranteed service or something like that. 
>
>hope this helps.
>
>"Jason A. Pattie" <pattieja@pcxperience.com> said:
>
>>Found the TOS field was being set to 0x10 for "ftp" traffic and 0x08 for 
>>"http" traffic.  What significance does that play?  And it is either 
>>being done by Squid or by Mozilla, don't know how to tell which, though.
>>
>>Michael T. Babcock wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 12:04:28PM -0600, Jason A. Pattie wrote:
>>>
>>>>Where in the output of tcdump does the TOS field appear?  I did the 
>>>>'tcpdump -n -v -v' on the firewall and dumped the output to a file as I 
>>>>started the Linux kernel download.  Is it appropriate to attach the 
>>>>output (I stopped it after around 250 packets)?
>>>>
>>>In the version I have of tcpdump TOS only shows up when its set to
>>>something special.
>>>
>>-- 
>>Jason A. Pattie
>>pattieja@pcxperience.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
>>http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/
>>
>
>
>

-- 
Jason A. Pattie
pattieja@pcxperience.com




_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/