From: Martin Devera <devik@cdi.cz>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB not working quite the way I'd expect?
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 22:25:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-101277516706242@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-101262785901252@msgid-missing>
> > rate 192901bps 236pps backlog 36p
> > rate 191724bps 239pps
> > rate 1380bps 9pps
>
> Now that I study this a bit more, how can it be that the parent class,
> 1:1, has a rate that is LESS than the sum of its children's rates?
> Either I've uncovered a bug, or I'm greatly misunderstanding something.
> ;)
The rate discrepancy is ok. Each class is averaged on its own and
there is really possible to overshot parent's rate for a while. It
is accounted to the child later.
But is seems to me that problem is at your www server. First, the
HTB reports no backlog for the www connection - VERY unlikely ! It
means that all data has been sent and no new arrived.
The same is shown by tokens. They are positive which means that
class is not throtling your data.
I'm not sure what is going here but absence of backlog is alarming.
SFQ can hold up to 128 packets and server which is trying to send
more data would create some backlog, wouldn't it ?
devik
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-03 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-02 5:32 [LARTC] HTB not working quite the way I'd expect? Jason Tackaberry
2002-02-02 13:14 ` Martin Devera
2002-02-03 19:41 ` Jason Tackaberry
2002-02-03 20:20 ` Martin Devera
2002-02-03 21:01 ` Jason Tackaberry
2002-02-03 21:11 ` Jason Tackaberry
2002-02-03 22:25 ` Martin Devera [this message]
2002-02-03 22:37 ` Jason Tackaberry
2002-02-04 7:01 ` Martin Devera
2002-02-04 15:04 ` Jason Tackaberry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-101277516706242@msgid-missing \
--to=devik@cdi.cz \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.