From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stef Coene Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:05:10 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] exploring HTB Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org > 2> Manual states that "... ... ... Now we can optionally attach queuing > disciplines to the leaf classes... ... ... tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent > 1:10 handle 20: pfifo limit 5... ... ...". If I not going to do that still > I'm fine with my rule set, as written "optional". Then is there benefit or > payoff against this leaf-class? Each class has a qdisc attached. By default, this is a FIFO one (First In,= =20 First Out). You can replace it with a SFQ qdisc. A SFQ qdisc will treath = each flow with the same priority. So one flow can not eat all bandwidth. > 3> A Small but nice document about Cross device sharing on link > http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/htbmeas1.htm. Can=92t this limitation = of > slot be increased? Can't find that page. > > 4> It would be nice if someone help me by providing statistics over number > of queues and filter. What is maximum limit of these two for a PIII 700 > with 256 MB RAM? How much maximum bandwidth can be shaped? I think you can shape a lot of traffic with this setup, but I don't know=20 exactly. Stef --=20 stef.coene@docum.org More QOS info : http://www.docum.org/ Title : "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/