From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Devera Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 18:27:35 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] priority bands don't reduce interactive latency? Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org post your conf. hard to say without it .. > I then discovered that cqb was not accurate. > In new howto I discovered htb but it seems that latency goes very high. > I used script from howto. I will publish it if you ask but it seems > there is some serious problem in htb or prio. I am not alone as you can > see. > > > > I have just read this message (of 2 years ago...) and I have the same > > > problem: I have a similar setup (I have used prio and htb) and when link > > > is full latency of classes with high priority raise from 200 to 2000ms. > > > In htb tutorial it show that latency of classes with prio 0 goes down. > > > Using prio does not work. Is there something missing? _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/